The ACO, which focuses on a larger community, is called a Responsible Care Group (VAC). CAC is an important variant of the ACO model because, by focusing on the broader community, they can address the social determinants of health and health inequalities that have such profound consequences on the health and well-being of community members, including their risks to substance abuse, substance use disorders and related health consequences.344 There are already health professionals who remain reluctant to the health and well-being of community members. , patients to allow drug treatment (MAT), mainly preservative drugs (methadone and buprenorphine) for opioid use disorders, due to deep-rooted but false misunderstandings about these treatments, such as the idea that they “replace one addiction with another”. 24 This has also hindered the adoption of these effective drugs through treatment options for dense seeds; and when used by suppliers of substances, they are often prescribed at insufficient doses, for insufficient durations, which contributes to the failure of treatment and reinforces the belief that they are not effective.25 Indeed, a comprehensive study shows that if used correctly, MAT can reduce or eliminate illicit use and crime and transmission of infectious diseases and restore patient functioning.25 “27,28 Given that the treatment of substances with a disorder is currently not well integrated and services are often provided by multiple systems, it can be difficult to effectively measure the quality of treatment and the results associated with it. The ability to follow the service in these different environments is essential to meet this challenge. For example, community-based monitoring systems are being developed for risk assessment and youth protection.128-130 Chart 6.1 summarizes some of the most important changes that occur when substance treatment services are integrated into general health care. In 2013, about three-quarters of general health care acquired in the United States was paid for by private insurance, Medicare or Medicaid. The remainder was covered by consumers who paid out of pocket, through other federal health grants, programs and other insurance provided by the DoD, the Department of Veterans Affairs and other public and local programs.211 In the case of drug disorder treatment, only about 45 percent of the expenses were spent by private, Medicare or Medicaid. In 2014, the majority of substance funding for the treatment of disorders came from public (non-drug) and local governments (29%). A 2012 study evaluated people with opioid use disorders who received 6 months of buprenorphine naloxone treatment as part of primary treatment. It estimated that office-based buprenorphine naloxone treatment for clinically stable patients has a cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 38,107 per QALY compared to no treatment at 24 months229. By calculating the differences between treatment costs between patients treated with buprenorphine naloxone and those who did not receive treatment with buprenorphine naloxone, they were divided by the different health outcomes of the patients.
/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CodeLineHeaderLogo3.png 0 0 matheau /wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CodeLineHeaderLogo3.png matheau2020-12-17 16:43:542020-12-17 16:43:54Substance Use Disorder Agreement