For minor children, their father is the legal guardian and, in his absence, their mother will be the legal guardian. A father is entitled by law to custody of his minor child and therefore cannot enter into an agreement inconsistent with his obligations under that custody. When such an agreement is reached, it is non-agreeable because it is contrary to public policy. Example: A, a father of one daughter promised to give a certain amount of money to B, a father of a minor boy and B agreed to marry his minor son with the daughter of A. Here, the agreement is non-conclusive, since it is contrary to public order. However, if a compromise agreement is reached before a complaint is filed, it would not mean stifling prosecutions, even if they are implemented after a complaint is filed, which is then withdrawn. Trade restriction agreements can be implemented if they are appropriate. If an ex-employee is subject to deference, the court will consider geographic boundaries, what the worker knows and the extent of the length of time. Deference to a business seller must be appropriate and binding where there is a true quality-will label.
Under common law, price-fixing contracts are legal. Single delivery agreements (“Solus”) are legal if reasonable. Contracts contrary to public policy are non-issue. Figure 2: A person `A` is convicted of murder and `B` is the witness. If an agreement is reached with “B” to change his testimony / not appear in court, it is illegal and not aeig. These are agreements with official office holders in which they undertake to use their influence for the benefit of the other party. For an agreement to be legally applicable, the parties must demonstrate an intention to create legal relationships. This can be done in writing or by acts interpreted by the courts as implicit. If an agreement is reached within the framework of trade relations and an agreement is reached, the Tribunal, in the absence of explicit contrary statements, will generally consider that legal relations were being contemplated. It is clear that the opinion and interpretation of public order is broad and that, on the basis of agreement and opposition, it is to the Discretion of the Tribunal itself. If an agreement is declared contrary to public policy, it will also be rescinded under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872. If an agreement is invalidated as opposed to public policy, it cannot challenge the order of the right of citizens to enter into a contract.
All agreements affecting or impeding the administration of justice are deemed null and void under section 23 of the Contract Act of 1872. The courts must carefully consider the issue before moralizing the doctrine of public order for reasons of the development of public opinion. Agreements for general withholding of marriage are illegal, but can be binding if they are concluded with a particular person. An agreement not to live together after marriage is contrary to public order. It is the agreements that completely or partially prohibit a contracting party from asserting its rights to a contract are null and void in this regard. This type of error applies when the parties are wrong at the same time, but their mistakes are not the same.